H&M is STILL running adverts ‘sexualising’ children with the slogan ‘make those heads turn’

• ‘Back to school’ ads with the tagline appear on H&M’s Instagram despite apology

H&M is still promoting adverts featuring children with the slogan ‘make those heads turn’ even after it was forced to pull a picture of two young girls in uniform which parents slammed as ‘sexualised’.

One advert, which appears to be from the same ‘Back to School’ campaign and has the same tagline, is still up on the brand’s Instagram, despite it apology and assurance that it had removed the ad that sparked controversy.

A short video shows two girls turning to look as a young boy walks past, and is captioned: ‘How to make those heads turn on the first day of school’.

Another post on the H&M Kids page shows a little girl wearing a black tulle dress as the company plugged its Halloween range back in October.

The caption reads: ‘From glamorous divas to stylish trendsetters, get ready to turn heads and make this Halloween the best yet.’

After shoppers spotted a Facebook advert with the slogan ‘make those heads turn’ sparked criticism on social media, the company was forced to issue an apology and reflect on its processes.

‘We have removed this ad. We are deeply sorry for the offence this has caused and will look into how we present campaigns going forward,’ it said in a statement.

The brand added that the campaign was ‘live in Australia only’, however it went viral amid the backlash.

Pictures taken in what appears to be the same photoshoot also remain up on the global @hm_kids Instagram page, which has 3.8million followers.

The same girls pictured in the viral ‘Back to School fashion’ advertisement also feature in a video showing a little boy wearing a green baseball jacket.

Meanwhile more content which also shows a young girl modelling the clothes on a pink school bus set, was reshared with the same caption by parenting website babychakra.com. 

Furious activists and shoppers slammed H&M for the campaign, which was first launched last summer, after pictures from it resurfaced online.

High-profile Australian feminist commentator Melinda Tankard Reist fumed: ‘@hm @hmaustralia what is your intention with this sponsored Facebook ad?’ she fumed. 

‘Little schoolgirls generally don’t want to “turn heads”. The large numbers I engage with in schools want to be left alone to learn and have fun.’ 

Psychologist Dr Pam Spurr expressed her anger in a post on X, writing: ‘Your vile ad panders to paedophiles that it’s OK lusting after girls. Boycott H&M. A shameful exploitation of girls.’

Another user said: ‘What in the h[ell] is this. H&M sexualising children’. Meanwhile another labelled it an ‘inappropriate advert’ and said H&M should ‘think again very quickly’. 

One X user added: ‘The whole point of school uniforms is to stop kids using brands to shame other poorer kids, quite apart from the seedy undertones this advert has. What are H&M thinking?’

READ MORE: Balenciaga apologises for bondage-themed campaign featuring a child and excerpt from SCOTUS ruling on child abuse images

Another welcomed the brand’s apology but said the brand ‘haven’t yet addressed how anyone within the company came to show such appalling judgement in commissioning and signing off on it.’

The brand commented on social media: ‘This ad has now been removed. We are deeply sorry for the offense this has caused and will look into how we present campaigns going forward’. H&M has also been approached for comment. 

It comes after an advert for Rimmel London featuring Love Island star Lana Jenkins was banned in December.

The Facebook ad, seen on September 9, read: ‘Get ready to slay this back-to-school season. Get 25% off Multi-Tasker Concealer and other Rimmel faves…’

The post included a video of 25-year-old influencer Jenkins applying make-up, with further text underneath reading: ‘25% off Rimmel back to school.’

Two people complained that the ad was irresponsible for including the text ‘Get ready to slay this back-to-school season’.

They said it played on young girls’ insecurities by implying they were only ready for a new school year if they wore make-up.

Coty UK, trading as Rimmel London, said the ad was part of its ‘Back to School’ campaign but ‘in no way’ communicated a need to wear make-up, and instead targeted women aged 18 to 35 who were interested in cosmetics, beauty, fashion and make-up.

READ MORE: Fury over £200,000-a-month OnlyFans model’s billboard advert erected just yards from a primary school – as she says it’s ‘less racy than ads you see for lingerie’

It said the wording ‘Get ready to slay this back-to-school season’ was intended to motivate and build confidence, rather than prey on young girls’ insecurities.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the words ‘back-to-school season’, in conjunction with the ad’s vibrant pink colour scheme, books and star emojis and the fluffy pink pen held by Jenkins in the video, would primarily be understood by viewers as referring to the time of the year when students returned to senior school or sixth form college after the summer break, and would appeal to them.

The ASA said: ‘We considered that the use of the word ‘slay’ in the claim ‘Get ready to slay this back-to-school season’ implied that girls or young women were more likely to succeed or do well when they went back to school if they wore make-up, in this case a concealing and contouring product.

‘We considered the ad had the effect of playing on young girls’ insecurities about their appearance and therefore concluded it was irresponsible.’

The ASA ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: ‘We told Coty UK, trading as Rimmel London, that they should not play on young girls’ insecurities by implying that it was necessary to wear make-up to school to succeed.’