- Scientists say that protoplanets forming around young stars may not be round
- Simulations reveal that they would have been squashed flat like smarties
It might be common knowledge that Earth is round, but scientists now say this might not have always been the case.
In fact, rather than being spherical like a Malteser, scientists think Earth was flatter ‘like a Smartie’ very early in its lifetime.
Scientists previously assumed that ‘protoplanets’ – very young planets that have recently formed around stars – would be spheres.
To put this assumption to the test, researchers from the University of Central Lancashire simulated how planets might form from the discs of gas around stars.
This revealed that, rather than being round, newly formed planets are actually squashed flat.
This is the first time that scientists have ever looked at the 3D shape of newborn planets in their simulation.
Dr Dimitris Stamatellos, co-author of the paper, says: ‘We were very surprised that they turned out to be oblate spheroids, pretty similar to Smarties!
‘We have been studying planet formation for a long time but never before had we thought to check the shape of the planets as they form in the simulations.
‘We had always assumed that they were spherical.’
Most planets that we can observe are spheres, or at least are very close to being spheres.
The Earth is flattened at its poles by about 0.3 per cent, Jupiter by about 6 per cent, and Saturn by a whopping 10 per cent.
But the scientists now believe that protoplanets are flattened by around 90 per cent.
The protoplanet phase is thought to last between the first 1-5 million years of a planet’s existence.
Considering Earth is around 4.5 billion years old, it would have been Smartie shaped for a very small fraction of its early history.
There are currently two leading theories for how protoplanets form.
The first, explained lead researcher Dr Adam Fenton, is called the ‘core accretion’ theory.
This theory claims that planets form through the ‘gradual growth of dust particles that stick together to form progressively larger and larger objects on long timescales’.
The second theory is the disc-instability theory which claims that planets form in a relatively short time as the rotating gas disc around a young star quickly breaks up.
Dr Fenton says: ‘This theory is appealing due to the fact that large planets can form very quickly at large distances from their host star, explaining some exoplanet observations.’
Following the predictions of this theory, the researchers simulated the formation of gas planets around a young star.
Dr Fenton says that the computation was extremely demanding, requiring half a million CPU hours on the UK’s DiRAC High Performance Computing Facility.
However, once the simulation was complete, the researchers were surprised to find that the protoplanets were not spheres after all.
In their paper, to be published in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters, the researchers suggest that the planets become flat because they form within a spinning disk.
Just like a chef spinning a ball of pizza dough, the force of their spinning stretches and flattens out the young planet.
The researchers believe that planets only become spherical later on, as gas and other matter lands on their north and south poles more rapidly than at the equator.
These predictions may one day help settle the question of how planets form.
Observations of protoplanets are still very rare and have only become possible in the last few years.
However, the researchers expect that the flattening of protoplanets would be observable through telescopes.
They write: ‘We expect that this may lead to a strong modification of the observed properties of protoplanets with the viewing angle that needs to be taken into account when interpreting observations.’
But according to the core accretion theory, protoplanets would still be spherical.
This means that if researchers are able to observe flattened protoplanets this would be good evidence for the currently unfavoured disc-instability theory.
The researchers are currently following up to improve the computational model to compare results with future observations from the James Webb Space Telescope.
Dr. Thomas Hughes is a UK-based scientist and science communicator who makes complex topics accessible to readers. His articles explore breakthroughs in various scientific disciplines, from space exploration to cutting-edge research.
