Nottingham Forest unsuccessful in appeal against four-point Premier League points deduction

Nottingham Forest have been unsuccessful in their appeal against a four-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules (PSR).

Forest were docked four points by an independent commission appointed by the Premier League in March after admitting a breach of PSR, having overspent by £34.5million over a three-year period.

Under the guidelines, Forest could have been handed a six-point penalty, but were given a less severe punishment by the Premier League on account of their “early plea” and “excellent co-operation”.

Forest made their defence in a hearing on April 24 but the independent commission has decided to uphold the original penalty.

Forest remain 17th in the table, three points clear of Luton Town and the relegation zone with two matches of the season remaining.

How the bottom of the PL table looks

Position Team Played GD Points

17

36

-18

29*

18

36

-29

26

19

36

-35

24

20 (R)

36

-65

16

*Deducted four points

The club initially described themselves as “extremely dismayed by the tone and content of the Premier League’s submissions” following their deduction, adding they were “also surprised that the Premier League gave no consideration at all to the unique circumstances of the club and its mitigation”.

Forest argued that they were placed at a serious disadvantage to the other Premier League clubs who had significantly higher spending limits due to their longevity in the top flight.

Nuno Espirito Santo’s side are next in action against Chelsea at the City Ground on Saturday, before their final game of the season at Burnley.


Forest, points deductions and VAR


Clarity for Forest amid frustration

Analysis from The Athletic’s Nottingham Forest correspondent Paul Taylor

At least Nottingham Forest now finally have clarity over what they need to do to secure a third season of Premier League football.

There is significant frustration behind the scenes at the City Ground that their appeal against their four-point punishment for breaching profit and sustainability regulations has been unsuccessful.

There was a feeling among the Forest hierarchy that the punishment had been too severe. We now know that mood was not reflected by the appeals panel that heard their case on Wednesday April 24.

But the club now have clarity over what will be required to avoid being sucked into the bottom three and, ultimately, back into the Championship.

And it remains very much in their own hands. They know their fate will have to be decided on a pitch, not in an office.

Remaining games in battle to beat drop

Nottingham Forest Luton Town Burnley

May 11: Chelsea (h)

May 11: West Ham (a)

May 11: Tottenham (a)

May 19: Burnley (a)

May 19: Fulham (h)

May 19: Nottingham Forest (h)

In their two remaining games, against Chelsea at the City Ground on Saturday and at Burnley on the final day, they must secure more points than 18th-place Luton and Vincent Kompany’s Burnley, who are 19th, ahead of already relegated Sheffield United.

Forest have a three point advantage over Luton and boast a superior goal difference of -18, in comparison to Luton’s -29. So, barring some hugely dramatic results on the final day, a win over Chelsea this weekend would be almost enough.

This has been a chaotic season, one overshadowed by both PSR and VAR controversies, by blunt social media statements and the failed experiment that was the appointment of Mark Clattenburg as a referee analyst.

But Forest know what they must do to ensure it has a positive ending.

How did we get here?

Forest have signed more than 40 players since securing promotion in May 2022, with owner Evangelos Marinakis sanctioning a transfer spend of around £250m ($318m) to help the club establish themselves in the top flight.

Forest believed they had worked within the regulations when it came to the allowable losses with a lot of the issue centring around Brennan Johnson’s sale to Tottenham Hotspur.

The club’s argument — which they have made in conversations with the Premier League — was that they could have sold Johnson earlier in the window but doing so at that point would have meant accepting a markedly lower price. His sale did not go through until September 1, well after the financial year ended, for £47.5m.

New guidelines aimed at fast-tracking PSR decisions have been introduced to ensure any basic breaches of the regulations are dealt with in time for punishments, such as points deductions, to be levied in the same season as the charge is brought.

All clubs had to submit their accounts for 2022-23 by December 31 — rather than in March as they had previously — with any breaches and subsequent charges confirmed 14 days later.

GO DEEPER

What is PSR and why do Premier League rules only allow clubs to lose £105m?

(Tony McArdle/Everton FC via Getty Images)

Reference

Denial of responsibility! Elite News is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a comment