Network Rail chief exec was himself trapped on train with 982 others in Elizabeth Line meltdown while his son – also on the train

• Travellers reported being stuck in dark, cold carriages for more than three hours
• Singer James Blunt & TV presenter Rachel Riley amongst those stranded 
• Around seven trains stopped moving after overhead electrical cables were damaged in west London 

Network Rail’s CEO was one of hundreds of passengers stranded in trains for hours on Thursday night.

Chief executive at Network Rail, Andrew Haines, said he was trapped in a train with his son and 982 others.

Travellers reported being stuck in dark, cold carriages for more than three hours just outside Paddington Station that night, including TV presenter Rachel Riley and singer James Blunt who tweeted: ‘Been stuck somewhere outside Paddington for close to 4 hours now. Out of peanuts and wine.’

Around seven trains operated by the Elizabeth Line, Heathrow Express and Great Western Railway (GWR) stopped moving after overhead electrical cables were damaged in West London.

The next day, Mr Haines, 57, criticised his company’s safety procedures and customer service.

He said: ‘None of us would have wanted our friends or family to have had to go through it.

‘By coincidence, my son was on the same train as me along with 981 other people and provided ample feedback via our family WhatsApp group.

‘My heartfelt apologies to anyone caught up in last night’s problems.

‘I intend to use my own painful experience in committing to improve how we deliver for our customers and support our colleagues, especially when things go wrong.’

‘Yesterday evening was not one of our finest moments.’

The father, who also leads the Great British Railways Transition Team – which aims to improve and simplify train travel, added: ‘As an industry, we let down thousands of passengers after a hugely disruptive incident just outside of Paddington station.

‘For once I had the pain of experiencing it first hand, both as a customer and as a colleague looking to support others in a testing circumstance.

‘It wasn’t pleasant and I had the benefit of being with a great crew on a train with auxiliary power.

‘We failed as a system.

‘Too many individual actors seeing risk from their own perspective meant it was harder than it should have been to get things done whilst maintaining safety.

‘Multiple self-evacuations, because of the pace at which we were able to move or even access trains, cannot be regarded as good safety practice.

‘Lastly, we have gone backwards on customer service. Tools to look after passengers that I would have used as a station manager in 1987 – before I’d even seen a mobile phone – were not available and we were hardly great at it then.

‘We can do better than we did last night when we take customers’ legitimate concerns seriously.’