- By Kate Whannel
- Political reporter
Sir Keir Starmer is under increasing pressure to change his position on the Israel-Gaza war, after a trio of senior Labour figures called for a ceasefire.
The move from mayors Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham, and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, puts them at odds with their party leader.
Sir Keir has not called for a ceasefire, instead backing humanitarian pauses to help aid reach Gaza.
Labour frontbencher Steve Reed has defended Sir Keir’s position.
The shadow minister said humanitarian pauses would allow aid to enter Gaza “without stopping Israel taking action to disable the terrorists who attacked them in the first place”.
“A ceasefire would stop Israel from doing that, and would leave the terrorist capability intact,” he added.
In stopping short of backing a full ceasefire, the Labour leader is aligned with the UK government, as well as the US and EU.
Compared to a formal ceasefire, humanitarian pauses tend to last for short periods of time, sometimes just a few hours.
They are implemented purely with the aim of providing humanitarian support, as opposed to achieving long-term political solutions.
Israel began its bombing campaign in Gaza, cut off electricity and most water, and stopped imports of food, fuel and other goods in retaliation for a cross-border attack by Hamas on 7 October, in which at least 1,400 people were killed and 224 taken hostage.
Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry says 7,000 people have been killed in the territory since then and that its health system is facing total collapse, with a third of hospitals not functioning and the rest only treating emergency cases.
In a statement earlier, Mr Khan said Israel had a “right to defend itself” following the “appalling terror attack” of 7 October.
But he added a ceasefire would “allow the international community more time to prevent a protracted conflict in the region and further devastating loss of life”.
In a statement, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and local council leaders said Israel had the right to take “targeted action within international law”.
They added they had “profound concerns” about loss of lives in Gaza, and that it was “vital that urgent support and humanitarian aid is allowed into the area”.
The leaders said there should be a ceasefire “by all sides” and that all hostages should “be released unharmed”.
In a video, Scottish Labour leader Mr Sarwar said: “We are all so desperate for peace and are desperate to see the end of violence.”
“We need to see the immediate release of hostages, immediate access to humanitarian supplies… and the immediate cessation of violence with an end of rocket fire into and out of Gaza,” he added.
“And let me be clear, that means a ceasefire right now,” he added.
More on Israel-Gaza war
On Wednesday, shadow Scottish secretary Ian Murray said Sir Keir was likely to be the next prime minister, and therefore had to be “very careful” with what he said.
“It’s very easy for us all to sit in a warm bath of throwing around ceasefires, etc but Keir Starmer is in a very sensitive position,” he added.
Asked why the UK was not calling for a cessation of violence, Education Secretary Gillian Keegan told ITV that the government would not “cross that line of telling Israel it has anything but the right to defend itself”.
She said a humanitarian pause would enable British citizens to leave Gaza.
Mr Sunak told reporters on Thursday that the Foreign Office is in contact with around 200 UK nationals in Gaza.
Labour Gaza tensions
The Labour leader’s overall stance on the Israel-Gaza conflict has also led to growing discomfort in his party.
He triggered anger earlier this month, when in reply to an interview question on whether it was “appropriate” for Israel to cut off the supply of power and water to Gaza, he said: “I think that Israel does have that right.”
“Obviously everything should be done within international law, but I don’t want to step away from the core principles that Israel has a right to defend herself,” he added.
A spokesman for the Labour leader later said he had only meant to say Israel had a general right to self-defence.
At least 19 councillors have since quit Labour in protest. In Oxford, resignations have led to Labour losing its majority on the local council.
In Westminster, 39 Labour MPs – including shadow minister Imran Hussain – have signed a parliamentary petition calling for an “immediate de-escalation and cessation of hostilities”.
Senior figures adding their voice to calls for a ceasefire is certainly uncomfortable for the Labour leadership.
Especially following a recent conference where their outward message was one of unity – a shift away from past divisions and factions within senior ranks of the party.
So far, most of the dissent in the party has been from councillors while dozens of Labour MPs have now said publicly they want a ceasefire.
While there’s been chatter of frontbenchers considering resignations, that hasn’t transpired so far.
Certainly, senior figures in the party have told me that engagement with concerned MPs is ongoing and that the party is trying to support those who have received threats or abuse as a result of the party’s position.
They don’t deny that lots of people are very concerned. But they argue that at the same time the last thing many in the party want to see is an internal fight – especially if there is an awareness that resignations may not change the leadership’s position.
Nor can the Labour leadership’s position really change what is going on in Israel and Gaza.
But for some it feels more like a matter of principle than actually changing anything.
Some may begin to feel the heat more from constituents as MPs begin another recess this week.
William Turner is a seasoned U.K. correspondent with a deep understanding of domestic affairs. With a passion for British politics and culture, he provides insightful analysis and comprehensive coverage of events within the United Kingdom.
