Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S. & Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 725–732 (2009).
Dehal, P. & Boore, J. L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3, e314 (2005).
Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, 1970).
Donoghue, P. & Purnell, M. Genome duplication, extinction and vertebrate evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 312–319 (2005).
Holland, L. Z. & Ocampo Daza, D. A new look at an old question: when did the second whole genome duplication occur in vertebrate evolution? Genome Biol. 19, 2–5 (2018).
Shimeld, S. M. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish). Development 139, 2091–2099 (2012).
Kuraku, S., Meyer, A. & Kuratani, S. Timing of genome duplications relative to the origin of the vertebrates: did cyclostomes diverge before or after? Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 47–59 (2009).
Sacerdot, C., Louis, A., Bon, C., Berthelot, C. & Roest Crollius, H. Chromosome evolution at the origin of the ancestral vertebrate genome. Genome Biol. 19, 166 (2018).
Escriva, H., Manzon, L., Youson, J. & Laudet, V. Analysis of lamprey and hagfish genes reveals a complex history of gene duplications during early vertebrate evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1440–1450 (2002).
Holland, P. W. H., Garcia-Fernandez, J., Williams, N. A. & Sidow, A. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development 120, 125–133 (1994).
Nakatani, Y. et al. Reconstruction of proto-vertebrate, proto-cyclostome and proto-gnathostome genomes provides new insights into early vertebrate evolution. Nat. Commun. 12, 4489 (2021).
Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 820–830 (2020).
Putnam, N. H. et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453, 1064–1071 (2008).
Nakatani, Y., Takeda, H., Kohara, Y. & Morishita, S. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 1254–1265 (2007).
Lamb, T. D. Analysis of paralogons, origin of the vertebrate karyotype, and ancient chromosomes retained in extant species. Genome Biol. Evol. 13, evab044 (2021).
Smith, J. J. & Keinath, M. C. The sea lamprey meiotic map improves resolution of ancient vertebrate genome duplications. Genome Res. 25, 1081–1090 (2015).
Smith, J. J. et al. The sea lamprey germline genome provides insights into programmed genome rearrangement and vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 50, 270–277 (2018).
Mehta, T. K. et al. Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16044–16049 (2013).
Pascual-Anaya, J. et al. Hagfish and lamprey Hox genes reveal conservation of temporal colinearity in vertebrates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 859–866 (2018).
Smith, J. J., Antonacci, F., Eichler, E. E. & Amemiya, C. T. Programmed loss of millions of base pairs from a vertebrate genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 11212–11217 (2009).
Kohno, S., Kubota, S. & Nakai, Y. in The Biology of Hagfishes 81–100 (Springer, 1998).
Putnam, N. H. et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 26, 342–350 (2016).
Kuraku, S. Insights into cyclostome phylogenomics: pre-2R or post-2R. Zool. Sci. 25, 960–968 (2008).
Aken, B. L. et al. The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database 2016, baw093 (2016).
Heimberg, A. M., Cowper-Sal·lari, R., Sémon, M., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Peterson, K. J. microRNAs reveal the interrelationships of hagfish, lampreys, and gnathostomes and the nature of the ancestral vertebrate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19379–19383 (2010).
Fromm, B. et al. MirGeneDB 2.1: toward a complete sampling of all major animal phyla. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D204–D210 (2022).
Kuraku, S. & Kuratani, S. Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 23, 1053–1064 (2006).
Kuratani, S. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology Vol. 141 (ed. Gilbert, S. F.) 207–239 (Academic Press, 2021).
Szöllősi, G. J., Rosikiewicz, W., Boussau, B., Tannier, E. & Daubin, V. Efficient exploration of the space of reconciled gene trees. Syst. Biol. 62, 901–912 (2013).
Shimodaira, H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51, 492–508 (2002).
Paps, J. & Holland, P. W. H. Reconstruction of the ancestral metazoan genome reveals an increase in genomic novelty. Nat. Commun. 9, 1730 (2018).
Bowles, A. M. C., Bechtold, U. & Paps, J. The origin of land plants is rooted in two bursts of genomic novelty. Curr. Biol. 30, 530–536.e2 (2020).
Guijarro-Clarke, C., Holland, P. W. H. & Paps, J. Widespread patterns of gene loss in the evolution of the animal kingdom. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 519–523 (2020).
Tan, M. et al. The whale shark genome reveals patterns of vertebrate gene family evolution. eLife 10, e65394 (2021).
Boehm, T. et al. Evolution of alternative adaptive immune systems in vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 36, 19–42 (2018).
Meyer, A. & Van de Peer, Y. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). BioEssays 27, 937–945 (2005).
Nakatani, Y. & McLysaght, A. Macrosynteny analysis shows the absence of ancient whole-genome duplication in lepidopteran insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1816–1818 (2019).
Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi5884 (2022).
Hillier, L. W. et al. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432, 695–716 (2004).
Braasch, I. et al. The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human–teleost comparisons. Nat. Genet. 48, 427–437 (2016).
Venkatesh, B. et al. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature 505, 174–179 (2014).
Zhang, X. et al. The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration. PLOS Biol. 15, e2003790 (2017).
Huang, S. et al. Decelerated genome evolution in modern vertebrates revealed by analysis of multiple lancelet genomes. Nat. Commun. 5, 5896 (2014).
Parey, E. et al. An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication. Genome Res. 32, 1685–1697 (2022).
Timoshevskaya, N. et al. An improved germline genome assembly for the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus illuminates the evolution of germline-specific chromosomes. Cell Rep. 42, 112263 (2023).
Redmond, A. K., Casey, D., Gundappa, M. K., Macqueen, D. J. & McLysaght, A. Independent rediploidization masks shared whole genome duplication in the sturgeon-paddlefish ancestor. Nat. Commun. 14, 2879 (2023).
Marlétaz, F. et al. Amphioxus functional genomics and the origins of vertebrate gene regulation. Nature 564, 64–70 (2018).
Oisi, Y., Ota, K. G., Kuraku, S., Fujimoto, S. & Kuratani, S. Craniofacial development of hagfishes and the evolution of vertebrates. Nature 493, 175–180 (2013).
Sandve, S. R., Rohlfs, R. V. & Hvidsten, T. R. Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication. Nat. Genet. 50, 908–909 (2018).
Álvarez-Carretero, S. et al. A species-level timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data. Nature 602, 263–267 (2022).
Gundappa, M. K. et al. Genome-wide reconstruction of rediploidization following autopolyploidization across one hundred million years of salmonid evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msab310 (2022).
Lien, S. et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533, 200–205 (2016).
Martin, K. J. & Holland, P. W. H. Enigmatic orthology relationships between Hox clusters of the African butterfly fish and other teleosts following ancient whole-genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2592–2611 (2014).
Robertson, F. M. et al. Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification. Genome Biol. 18, 111 (2017).
Doyle, J. J. & Egan, A. N. Dating the origins of polyploidy events. New Phytol. 186, 73–85 (2010).
Shimeld, S. M. & Holland, P. W. H. Vertebrate innovations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4449–4452 (2000).
Peterson, K. J. et al. MicroRNAs as indicators into the causes and consequences of whole-genome duplication events. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msab344 (2022).
Donoghue, P. C. J. & Keating, J. N. Early vertebrate evolution. Palaeontology 57, 879–893 (2014).
Kon, T. et al. The genetic basis of morphological diversity in domesticated goldfish. Curr. Biol. 30, 2260–2274.e6 (2020).
Qiu, T., Liu, Z. & Liu, B. The effects of hybridization and genome doubling in plant evolution via allopolyploidy. Mol. Biol. Rep. 47, 5549–5558 (2020).
Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 30, 159–165 (2016).
Barker, M. S., Arrigo, N., Baniaga, A. E., Li, Z. & Levin, D. A. On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids. New Phytol. 210, 391–398 (2016).
Estep, M. C. et al. Allopolyploidy, diversification, and the Miocene grassland expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15149–15154 (2014).
Alix, K., Gérard, P. R., Schwarzacher, T. & Heslop-Harrison, J. S. (Pat).Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann. Bot. 120, 183–194 (2017).
Steensels, J., Gallone, B. & Verstrepen, K. J. Interspecific hybridization as a driver of fungal evolution and adaptation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 485–500 (2021).
Taylor, S. A. & Larson, E. L. Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 170–177 (2019).
Wu, Y. et al. Genomic mosaicism due to homoeologous exchange generates extensive phenotypic diversity in nascent allopolyploids. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa277 (2021).
Oisi, Y., Kakitani, O., Kuratani, S. & Ota, K. G. in In Situ Hybridization Methods Vol. 99 (ed. Hauptmann, G.) 249–262 (Springer, 2015).
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
Cunningham, F. et al. Ensembl 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D745–D751 (2019).
Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
Umu, S. U. et al. Accurate microRNA annotation of animal genomes using trained covariance models of curated microRNA complements in MirMachine. Cell Genomics 3, 100348 (2023).
Wheeler, B. M. et al. The deep evolution of metazoan microRNAs. Evol. Dev. 11, 50–68 (2009).
Smith, J. J. et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 45, 415–421 (2013).
Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Zhu, T. et al. Chromosome‐level genome assembly of Lethenteron reissneri provides insights into lamprey evolution. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 448–463 (2021).
Ebersberger, I., Strauss, S. & von Haeseler, A. HaMStR: profile hidden Markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 157 (2009).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, S4 (2007).
Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst. Biol. 55, 195–207 (2006).
Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095–1109 (2004).
Tavaré, S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17, 57–86 (1986).
Yang, Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 306–314 (1994).
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).
dos Reis, M. & Yang, Z. Approximate likelihood calculation on a phylogeny for Bayesian estimation of divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2161–2172 (2011).
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27, 1164–1165 (2011).
Le, S. Q. & Gascuel, O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1307–1320 (2008).
Whelan, S. & Goldman, N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 691–699 (2001).
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Bioinformatics 8, 275–282 (1992).
Dayhoff, M. O., Schwartz, R. M. & Orcutt, B. C. in Atlas of Protein Sequences and Structure (ed. Dayhoff, M. O.) 345–352 (National Biomedical Research Foundation, 1978).
Henikoff, S. & Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915–10919 (1992).
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 16, 157 (2015).
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).
Shimodaira, H. Approximately unbiased tests of regions using multistep-multiscale bootstrap resampling. Ann. Stat. 32, 2616–2641 (2004).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Van Dongen, S. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30, 121–141 (2008).
Mi, H., Poudel, S., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D336–D342 (2016).
Acemel, R. D. et al. A single three-dimensional chromatin compartment in amphioxus indicates a stepwise evolution of vertebrate Hox bimodal regulation. Nat. Genet. 48, 336–341 (2016).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
Yang, Z. PAML 4: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
Löytynoja, A. & Goldman, N. Phylogeny-aware gap placement prevents errors in sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. Science 320, 1632–1635 (2008).
Zhou, Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).
Mi, H. et al. PANTHER version 16: a revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D394–D403 (2021).
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Uesaka, M., Kuratani, S., Takeda, H. & Irie, N. Recapitulation-like developmental transitions of chromatin accessibility in vertebrates. Zool. Lett. 5, 33 (2019).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Li, Q., Brown, J. B., Huang, H. & Bickel, P. J. Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5, 1752–1779 (2011).
Brawand, D. et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478, 343–348 (2011).
Brazeau, M. D. The braincase and jaws of a Devonian ‘acanthodian’ and modern gnathostome origins. Nature 457, 305–308 (2009).
Clement, A. M. et al. Neurocranial anatomy of an enigmatic Early Devonian fish sheds light on early osteichthyan evolution. eLife 7, e34349 (2018).
Davis, S. P., Finarelli, J. A. & Coates, M. I. Acanthodes and shark-like conditions in the last common ancestor of modern gnathostomes. Nature 486, 247–250 (2012).
Gabbott, S. E. et al. Pigmented anatomy in Carboniferous cyclostomes and the evolution of the vertebrate eye. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161151 (2016).
Giles, S., Friedman, M. & Brazeau, M. D. Osteichthyan-like cranial conditions in an Early Devonian stem gnathostome. Nature 520, 82–85 (2015).
Keating, J. N. & Donoghue, P. C. J. Histology and affinity of anaspids, and the early evolution of the vertebrate dermal skeleton. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20152917 (2016).
Lundgren, M. & Blom, H. Phylogenetic relationships of the cyathaspidids (Heterostraci). GFF 135, 74–84 (2013).
Miyashita, T. et al. Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2146–2151 (2019).
Pernègre, V. N. & Elliott, D. K. Phylogeny of the Pteraspidiformes (Heterostraci), Silurian–Devonian jawless vertebrates. Zool. Scr. 37, 391–403 (2008).
Randle, E. & Sansom, R. S. Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 15, 583–599 (2017).
Sansom, R. S. Phylogeny, classification and character polarity of the Osteostraci (Vertebrata). J. Syst. Palaeontol. 7, 95–115 (2009).
Zhu, M. & Gai, Z. Phylogenetic relationships of galeaspids (Agnatha). Front. Biol. China 2, 151–169 (2007).
Brazeau, M. D. Problematic character coding methods in morphology and their effects. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 104, 489–498 (2011).
Lee, D. C. & Bryant, H. N. A reconsideration of the coding of inapplicable characters: assumptions and problems. Cladistics 15, 373–378 (1999).
Strong, E. E. & Lipscomb, D. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15, 363–371 (1999).
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Nielsen, R., Bollback, J. P. & Schultz, T. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52, 131–158 (2003).
Gower, J. C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857–874 (1971).
Guillerme, T. & Poisot, T. dispRity: a modular R package for measuring disparity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1755–1763 (2018).
Pascual-Anaya, J. & Böhmer, C. in Hox Modules in Evolution and Development 121–139 (CRC Press, 2023).
Dr. Thomas Hughes is a UK-based scientist and science communicator who makes complex topics accessible to readers. His articles explore breakthroughs in various scientific disciplines, from space exploration to cutting-edge research.
