Doubt cast on Sunak’s £2,000 Labour tax attack during TV debate – as PM accused of ‘lie’ | Politics News

The prime minister said Labour’s plans will create a £38.5bn hole in public finances over four years but Sir Keir Starmer rejected that accusation during the first leaders’ debate of the election. On Wednesday, other senior figures went further to accuse the prime minister of lying.

By Alix Culbertson, Political reporter @alixculbertson


Labour’s shadow chancellor has accused Rishi Sunak of lying after he claimed Sir Keir Starmer wants to put taxes up by £2,000 a year.

Mr Sunak claimed multiple times during the first TV election debate that Labour’s plans for the country were not costed and would require annual tax rises of £2,000 per family due to a £38.5bn black hole over four years, a number he said was worked out by impartial civil servants.

Follow live – Fresh debate poll has very different result

Sir Keir called the claim “absolute garbage” during the ITV debate on Tuesday, but two members of his shadow cabinet have gone further on Wednesday and said the prime minister lied.

Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, said: “Keir Starmer was really clear last night that what the prime minister said was utter garbage.

“I would go further than that. The prime minister lied in the debate last night about Labour’s tax plans.

“Labour will not be increasing taxes on working people. I am very clear about that. And everything in our manifesto will be fully costed and fully funded.”

She accused Mr Sunak of lying 12 times about Labour’s tax plans during the debate.

Shadow minister Jonathan Ashworth also told Sky News’ Breakfast with Kay Burley earlier: “This is a desperate lie.”

Sunak lied about Labour’s tax plans – Ashworth

The UK Statistics Authority, which safeguards the production and publication of official statistics, told Sky News it is “looking into” Mr Sunak’s claims Labour’s tax rises will cost families £2,000 each.

The Labour Party said the costings relied on “assumptions from special advisers” appointed by the prime minister rather than an impartial Civil Service assessment.

Doubt was also cast on the Tory claims by a note from the Treasury’s chief civil servant which emerged on Wednesday. It said civil servants were not involved in the calculation of the total figure used and that he had reminded ministers not to present any costings as having been produced by civil servants.

In the letter to Labour’s shadow Treasury chief secretary Darren Jones, the Treasury’s permanent secretary James Bowler said the £38.5bn total for Labour policies in the Tory document “includes costs beyond those provided by the Civil Service”.

“Costings derived from other sources or produced by other organisations should not be presented as having been produced by the Civil Service,” he said in a letter to Mr Jones on 3 June.



Image:
A letter from a top Treasury official casting doubt on a Tory claim that civil servants have been used to put a price on Labour’s spending plans

Ms Reeves said the letter makes it “absolutely clear” that Mr Sunak lied.

But energy secretary Claire Coutinho said the numbers were signed off by Mr Bowler, adding: “They will not sign off things which are dodgy and, if anything, this underestimates the cost to families.”

The Conservatives have repeatedly claimed during the first two weeks of the election campaign that Labour have no plans for the UK’s future.

During the debate, Mr Sunak used the same line of attack, adding: “Keir Starmer is asking you to hand him a blank cheque when he hasn’t said what he’ll buy with it or how much it’s going to cost you.”

The key moments from the first TV debate

Sunak v Starmer debate highlights


This is a limited version of the story so unfortunately this content is not available.

Open the full version

A Conservative spokesman said: “We were fair to Labour in the production of the Labour tax rise briefing note and used clear Labour policies, their own costings or official HMT [His Majesty’s Treasury] costings using the lowest assumptions.

“For example, using Labour’s figures for the spending items in the Green Prosperity Plan using £23.7bn over four years instead of £28bn a year.

“It is now for Labour to explain which of the policies which were Labour policy no longer are Labour policy.”

Read more:
PM may have shaded it but probably won’t win election

Why Wales’s first minister faces confidence vote today – and his own party says he could lose


This is a limited version of the story so unfortunately this content is not available.

Tap here to follow Politics at Jack at Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

A snap YouGov poll after the debate found Mr Sunak narrowly came out on top, with 51% of the audience believing he fared better than Sir Keir.

But a poll by Savanta published on Wednesday morning had Sir Keir coming out on top with 44% and Mr Sunak on 39%, while 17% did not know.

When asked who came across as the most honest, the 1,153 adults polled by Savanta found Sir Starmer was the most honest (54%), while 29% thought Mr Sunak was.

Reference

Denial of responsibility! Elite News is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a comment